I've checked my database and I still have all three variants in my database. Although the previous change was subtle, I can still remember that this was an issue then and that I had no votes on a number of contributions. Given the reactions in this topic, I don't expect this to happen again

It would have been best if the symbols themselves could be added as details, but that will never happen, because even simple errors after the server migration are not fixed.

I was initially curious whether similar situations had already occurred in other localities and how this was handled. Unfortunately, no one has been able to clarify this so far.

I can live with both options as long as it is done by everyone. So either the same description for the symbol everywhere or the 3 different descriptions based on the release date. I think I have a slight preference for keeping it at 1 description because that is the clearest. That does mean that I have to adjust a few hundred profiles and if the description changes again, I would have to do this again. For now I'm waiting for the screeners' verdict on whether they approve this for old profiles or not.

As I said, I would prefer to see that you could choose symbols, because apart from the 3 variants for this one symbol I also see different ways of writing it. In particular (copied) Belgian profiles often use capitalized versions such as "Roken, Alcohol en Drugs" of "Grof Taalgebruik". It would be nice if that was also limited to capitalizing the first letter and only the first rating detail.